Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/With Anger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 19:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] With Anger

Nomination This entry fails the WP:MUSIC criteria for establishing notability for a band, and is therefore arguably advertising in violation of WP:NOT Section 1.4.3. Depending on how you interpret "had immediate success" and "playing with" the likes of Dying Fetus and Napalm Death, it may even fail WP:CSD 1.2.7 for failing to claim notability, since the claim is the (true) claim simply to have played at least once at the same venue as Dying Fetus and Napalm Death, not the (false) claim to have toured with them. The Literate Engineer 05:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Just being a band from Germantown, MD doesn't cut it for asserting importance. Mitaphane _talk 05:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - The nom pretty much summed it all up. I'm not feeling like listing all the criteria, but head over here and check them if you feel inclined. Keep in mind that although the article specifies that some of the band's members played together in another band, the earlier band is not notable either (per its lack of article and a google search). In my mind, this was the only criterion that was even close. -bobby 15:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 23:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BAND. NawlinWiki 06:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.