Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wirral (crater)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wirral (crater)

Wirral (crater) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is about a crater on Phobos that is officially unnamed and probably not notable, the user who created the page has apparently just decided to give it a name and create an article. Snigbrook 00:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete. It was given that name... yesterday? And by some nobody without authority? --Blanchardb 01:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I could not tell it from a hole in the ground. This particular hole is not recognized by the IAU (look it up in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature) and has no other redeeming value. MER-C 02:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. -- Jack 02:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a hoax. "Havard" (sic) University astrology section? Yeah, right. Clarityfiend 03:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as absolute BS. Paragon12321 03:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Complete crap. As I wrote on the talk page (was part of the prod2 tag I placed). The crater this article refers to has never been named, and is not mentioned in a list of craters on Phobos. ARendedWinter 05:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Even if that does eventually turn out to be the crater's name neither that or the crater itself is notable in any way. Alberon 10:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - me too - reconsider in 2008 after naming has been agreed Victuallers 13:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete — Probably a hoax. Astronomical names are officially determined by the IAU, not a university's astrology section (if such even exist). — RJH (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, sorry guys, 'twas a hoax. Delete as you wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CalumRedhead (talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.