Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingman (Coors Light)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, nonsense --Tone 14:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wingman (Coors Light)

Wingman (Coors Light) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Prod (and cats) removed by IP with no explanation. Article is written like a bad essay rather than an encyclopedia article and does not assert any notability. It is simply about an advertisement term. Only one of three refs is worthy (others being a wiki article and Youtube video), and it is a mention is a book which is unknown how it relates to article. Wow, now that I'm looking around, it was created by a new user called User:Andrew McAwesome, who also created the only links to the article. Reywas92Talk 03:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I don't think G1 applies, as the article is certainly long enough to establish context; G1 is usually for sub-stubs with insufficient context. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete It's basically a lengthly essay of one of the "Real Men of Genius" commercials- they aren't notable one-by-one, and it has quite a bit of OR. Any salvageable information is already in Wingman (social), which this article actually cites as a source. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.