Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windhexe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. ¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?!Join Esperanza! 08:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Windhexe
Wikipedia is not a site to announce your future products. --Pjacobi 14:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I actually saw a lot of news coverage of this when it was first announced, even if I didn't recall this specific name. FrozenPurpleCube 15:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Did you see any product becoming availale in the three years since then? --Pjacobi 15:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't actually looked, since I'm not involved in waste management. However, they do seem to have something going on, since they claim to offer quotes on their site, and have photos. Besides, it doesn't matter, it made the news once, that establishes notability and verifiability. And that includes MSNBC [1], the New York Times [2] and the Washington Post [3]. Even if it never came out, it'd still be part of the historical record. FrozenPurpleCube 16:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Did you see any product becoming availale in the three years since then? --Pjacobi 15:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Keep WP:NOT crystal ball doesn't not apply here, which is what I'm assuming what's being argued. From WP:NOT, It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, provided that discussion is properly referenced. The item in question has been covered by 3 reliable sources and article makes no speculative statements about it. —Mitaphane talk 23:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Best available info is that it exists, it works, it does something useful. Murray Baker. --210.84.59.171 12:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.