Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windforce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Rje 16:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Windforce

  • KEEP Windofrce is really popular on the west coast...I went to school in Los Angeles, and i saw quite a few...it wasn't a party without it.
  ATTENTION!

If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum asking you to do so, please note that the deletion process is designed to determine the consensus of opinion of Wikipedia editors; for this reason comments from users whose histories do not show experience with or contributions to Wikipedia, and particularly, to this article, are traditionally given less weight and may be discounted entirely by the closing Administrator.

You are not barred from participating in the discussion, or making your opinion known here, no matter how new you may be: we welcome reasoned opinions and rational discussion based upon our policies and guidelines. However, ballot stuffing is pointless. There is no ballot to stuff, because this is not a vote. Please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy for more information.

Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!
  • KEEP Just because a handful of losers have not heard of Windforce is not grounds for deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jbp126 (talk • contribs) 01:46, May 19, 2006.
  • KEEP Does ne 1 who posted to delete have a fuckin life? How did you find this analysis of a beer bong. HOW!!!!!!!!!!????? Thus it is amazing and i think you should keep it. I am a nice child who likes candy and walks on the beach, does ne one wanna take me out on a date. Im looking for someone a lil younger than me, like mayb15 years. I like their tight pussy's. It makes my nuts snug. If you are between the ages of 10-12 and are living cantact me. My sn is littlenastygirl1992. Make sur dateline isn't there when i will meet you. The things i will do to you you wouldn't imagine. I am a true thrilla in manilla. I could bring my dog and we could make this a good old fashoned game of farmhouse gangbang. Dogs on the otherhand are more fun than girls, because their assholes are so tight when they cut off the circulation in your wanker it sends a rush of blood to your brain. I usually eat the dogs after i plant my seed in them. Well im off. Just remember Windforce=sex with tiny twats=dog sex= a grand old time.! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.172.198.89 (talk • contribs) 01:17, May 19, 2006.
  • FUCK WEIKIPEDIA I WILL spread ur asscheaks weikipedia. just relax ur ass hole and i will be fittin to try me some of this at home. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.172.198.89 (talk • contribs) 01:11, May 19, 2006.
  • I think this is a neologism. Joyous | Talk 23:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.--Andrew c 00:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete If this neologism does exist, it exists in one dorm of one college. "Windforce" + "Beer bong" gets only 6 hits, of which only 3 are unique (and the first is the Wikipedia article). Windforce + funnel gets only 91 G-hits, and aside from the first one (which, again, is the WP page), every hit is a false positive. The article, thus, is nonsense. -- Kicking222 00:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP It is true, I hear it here in Maryland! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.14.135.82 (talk • contribs) 02:32, May 16, 2006.
  • KEEP The first time I came across windforce was my freshman year at Hampshire. Following that I heard it multiple times up and down the east coast. I am positive windforce exists as far as California.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.228.159.189 (talk • contribs) 02:45, May 16, 2006.
  • Delete never heard of it. not notable. --MarsRover 06:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NEO. Stifle (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete lacks any reliable sources, and I couldn't find any on Google. I think Stifle has it right. Just zis Guy you know? 20:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP The windforve does exist ignore anyone who says it doesn't I have been to parties all over Massachusetts and areas around here and numerous people have them. The windforce device is truely incredible and they are easy to make. Not to mention the after effects are more than pleasing. I think any true partier should have one. Windforce is not a myth! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jwilkz10 (talk • contribs) 20:40, May 16, 2006.
  • KEEPWindforce rules keep it! It will get you drunk! --Jwilkz10 (talk · contribs)
  • Comment seems like the sockpuppets gone wild here. MarsRover 06:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment If deleted, the image needs to go, too, as I believe it's a copyright violation. Joyous! | Talk 10:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP It seems that people are considering it as a neologism, this needs to be proved. Also, just because people have not heard of it does not mean that it does not exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.135.82 (talk • contribs)
  • KEEPSome people say that the Holocaust didnt occur....tell me that didnt happen. As far as windforce goes, it is the greatest creation ever known to man.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.14.137.121 (talk • contribs) 00:27, May 19, 2006.
  • KEEP This is a legitimate term. Anyone who says otherwise must live in Morocco or in a hole. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.7.54 (talk • contribs) 01:07, May 19, 2006.
  • KEEP If this page gets deleted then i wouldn't know where to get my sorce of beer knowledge from. I WILL go on a mad retard riding campaign if this gets deleted. Enough said. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.14.135.82 (talk • contribs) 01:09, May 19, 2006.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.