Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wimpole 2000

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Angelo (talk) 16:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wimpole 2000

Contested PROD on a minor local football (soccer) team. Article's original creator contends that the team has received extensive news coverage, but all the linked articles relate to a single incident involving the referee of a match in which this team happened to be involved i.e. the team is not actually the subject of the coverage ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Club is not notable. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: This team's league is on the fifteenth rung of the English football system, far below the professional level; it's not far above a beer league. No reliable sources about the team, no notability established.  RGTraynor  13:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. As a precedent, the level of English football that is usually considered notable enough is Level 10. - fchd (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non notable, is too low down in the pyramid system. Eddie6705 (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete. As noted by the nominator, even though the club was the recipient of an unusual - and possibly even notable - action by a referee, that does not render the club itself notable. No other claim of notability for the club. —C.Fred (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.