Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williamsburg oil spill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied as a copyvio. Natalie 06:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Williamsburg oil spill

Williamsburg oil spill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No context given, this appears to be about a local news event rogerd 03:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No context, no data, no information. What in blazes is this? Please, somebody provide more data and at least some context. Is this for real? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, mainly it's a copy/paste of this site. Interesting blog. Now we can Delete this as a copyvio. It's at most Wikinews anyway. CitiCat 04:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Neutral for now. See The Ooze, a current New York magazine article about the 1940s oil spill (arguably augmented by a century of industrial chemical dumping) underneath Greenpoint. The article mentions cancers in the area that some believe are connected. This particular spill -- I'm not sure how much they're saying it's a separate spill and how much they're connecting it to the Greenpoint spill. It's a poorly written, POV article with atrocious sources. --Dhartung | Talk 04:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete lacks context, and thinly disguised copyvio of this article. Both speediable offenses. Ohconfucius 06:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.