Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Spaniel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 01:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] William Spaniel

William Spaniel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a vanity article, written at the subject's request by his fans, and based almost entirely on his column, written for a minor fansite (which he runs). He's never been the subject of significant commentary written by anyone other than himself; there are two links mentioning him in the external links, but both of those are responses to his critical articles, by the subjects of those criticism. There's no sources we can use to write an article about him, save for his own all-but-self-published column. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: As per nom. Bradybd 05:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Non-notable. --Dysepsion 07:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete but transwiki, since some good faith work was done here. Shrug. Sources are actually not the problem here due to him being an Internet writer, but Mr. Spaniel is quite simply not notable enough. SnowFire 12:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Referenced, but non-notable. --Ozgod 12:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.