Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Sledd (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] William Sledd
AfDs for this article:
Delete because it fails WP:BIO all references that I can access are just simply tiny 'mentions'. Still not notable outside youtube. YooTuba (talk) 23:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not the subject of non-trivial sources yet. Also recommend salt, as both previous AfDs resulted in delete. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)- Keep per Eastmain's sources, guess he is pretty well sourced. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Adequately documented on dead trees. The Baltimore Sun newspaper has an article. The link in William Sledd doesn't work, but an abstract can be seen at http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/baltsun/access/1287359241.html?dids=1287359241:1287359241&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jun+10%2C+2007&author=Sean+Patrick+Norris&pub=The+Sun&desc=YOUTUBE+POSTER+GLIDES+INTO+ONLINE+STARDOM+%3B+%60ASK+A+GAY+MAN%27+SHOW+MAKES+A+WEB+CELEBRITY+OF+ITS+CREATOR+AND+STAR%2C+WILLIAM+SLEDD%3B+SPOTLIGHT The Baltimore Sun is a reliable source. Even more reliable is the New York Times, which has a number of references: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22William+Sledd%22++site%3Anytimes.com --Eastmain (talk) 03:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep Just squeaks by, I think, and growing notability. It could be counter productive to delete this one, since I suspect we'd just have to put it back out in x months. Lawrence § t/e 17:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
