Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Connolley (4th nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW, especially given 3 prior debates reaching the same result. Newyorkbrad 08:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] William Connolley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Subject is an inherintly non-notable climate "scientist" whose main claim to fame is suprise, suprise, editing here on wikipedia--RCT 21:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep; Connolley's actions, including his Wikipedia editing, have been described in reliable sources such as Nature and The New Yorker. He also has numerous published papers in reputable scientific journals. All this clearly meets WP:BIO. *** Crotalus *** 21:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep or Speedy keep under WP:SNOW. This has survied 3 previous AfDs, all with keep, and has only been improved since. --Stephan Schulz 21:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • KeepThe arguments against deletion are as valid now as when prieviously the page has been voted on.Dejvid 22:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Make that a Speedy Keep.Dejvid 08:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Wow, how fucking rude can you get. RFerreira 04:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep pointless POV nomination in view of previous AfD and the articles. Does repeatedly proposing the same hopeless unlikely article amount to perhaps the same sort of interference with the work of WP as the continually repeated requests for equally unlikely edits in the article itself? DGG 04:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Crotalus, etc. Guettarda 05:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Why is this even here? How many times can a page be submitted to AfD? R. Baley 06:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. R. Baley's question appears quite relevant here. Stammer 08:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.