Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will MacKinley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:CSD#G4. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Will MacKinley

Will MacKinley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A self-published author (see publisher details at amazon: [1] and the publisher's website [2] who is insufficiently notable. Also, a probable copyvio of [3] (a bit more complicated than a simple copyvio though)so will be sent to WP:CP if not deleted here. CIreland (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Already been deleted once this month - why not speedy G4? JohnCD (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, since I'm not an admin and didn't see the first creation, I didn't know whether it was substantially the same article. CIreland (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Oddly, Suckeriddy, the author of the article has written "I do hold copyright on this artical" on its talk page [4]. Doesn't seem to grasp the point about Wikipedia. As the article is likely self-written, I can only hope that the spelling is better in his books than on the article's talk page. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G4, as substantially unchanged re-creation. Jeez, I hate having to !vote twice in one month on the same load of crap. If this is re-created again, it should be salted. Deor (talk) 00:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.