Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Bardwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. The outside campaign itself admits that the article doesn't "deserve recognition on the information superhighway." howcheng {chat} 17:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Will Bardwell

• non notable Redwood201 02:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 16:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete 500 hits on Google. nn r3m0t ^talk 17:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This guy has apparently won some journalism awards. I googled the Meridian Star and read some of his columns and they were really good. This guy's got talent. BarryManil0w 01:27, 22 December 2005 (EST)
• Keep This guy is awesome.
• Keep Award-winning journalist. Worked for a reputable newspaper. Sounds good enough for me. OldManJones 03:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Outside campaign [1] to keep this entry that is non notable.205.188.117.13 04:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Thought it was a close call, but he's mentioned on Answers.com and is the Attorney General of The University of Mississippi in addition to what appears to be a distinguished record as a journalist. Also, I'm not sure an outside campaign is any more ethically questionable than an anonymous snitch. NateShreve 02:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A sportswriter for a newspaper that doesn't even have an article. That Answers.com has mirrored our article is hardly a convincing reason to keep it. And note the scant contributions of most of the above users. —Cryptic (talk) 05:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.