Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Wayland Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 05:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wild_Wayland_Wrestling

Delete. Non-notable, appears to be a bunch of teenagers wrestling in their backyards. They have gotten themselves added to dmoz, which gives them a few google hits, but this doesn't make them notable. Xyzzyplugh 04:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Ruby 05:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Jersey Devil 05:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Worthythorn vandalised this vote; his (implicit) Keep vote read as reproduced below. Sandstein 12:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me, but I am 27 years old. We BEGAN as teenagers wrestling in our backyards, but if you had actually take the time to read the article, you would note that we are an organization now, fully bonded and licensed by the Kentucky Athletic Commission.

• Delete as above. NN even despite what the above comment says.Blnguyen 04:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Francisco Valverde 18:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. NN has been presumed from lack of familiarity, and not proven. Editors having a lack of familiarity with Kentucky doesn't mean that the topic is non-notable. The state of Kentucky would probably be unhappy to know that they are deemed NN. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 22:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.