Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WildOutwest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WildOutwest

Blatant vanity. lots of assertions, but seems nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment author has also created David shantz, David Shantz, WildOutWest and WildOutWest Venture Consulting. emabarrassing.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per nom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, vanity, and advertisement --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Kill this version, too. --Calton | Talk 04:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, since Wikipedia is still not a billboard. --Elkman - ^(talk) 05:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Destroy with extreme prejudice --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, the article is merely a vanity page for the co-founder. Royboycrashfan 06:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanispamcruftisment, nn. --Terence Ong 10:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-encyclopedic nn Celcius 13:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Whoever did this was spamming Wikipedia. ProhibitOnions 16:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, complete spam per above. Kuru ^talk 00:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.