Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipwnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted - nonsense, trollvertisement (vandalvertisement?). - Mike Rosoft 09:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipwnia

Wikipwnia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Likely troll article which violates WP:NEO, WP:SELF. Prod contested by an anon editor. Caknuck 05:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not necessary Julia 23:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as blatant trollery and per WP:DENY. --N Shar 06:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as G1-G3. John Vandenberg 06:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. It's just another way of saying "vandalism". BuickCenturyDriver 06:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, probably fits CSD G1, violates WP:SELF. Dave6 talk 07:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• I agree that this is G1, and I've tagged it as such, since others here have proposed it. — coelacan talk — 07:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.