Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia editor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Wikipedia. WjBscribe 23:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia editor

Wikipedia editor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Self-referential and redundant to the much superior WP:TOOLS. Contested prod. MER-C 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep, this isn't a WP internal page, this is an article on wikipedia tools that are probably notable enough. But the rationale of the nominator is a non-starter. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 03:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:ASR and per lack of attributable sources. Not appropriate for article-space unless the topic gets significant third-party coverage. WP:TOOLS serves as a project-space guide for editors; in the article space, WP:NOT a user's manual. Barno 03:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not only are these tools not notable outside of Wikipedia, but the basis of the article is wrong. Anyone who edits Wikipedia is a Wikipedia editor. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 03:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, in agreement with Mr.Z-man. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Wikipedia as plausible search term, and the way it used to be [1]. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-10 06:50Z
  • Redirect per Resurgent. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. Baristarim 11:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep, because Wikipedia editors are significant to us, right? --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
    Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? (talk · contribs) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Violates WP:ASR Rackabello 17:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Wikipedia. Acalamari 17:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect - as per Acalamari..--Cometstyles 17:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, redundant to Wikipedia. Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 17:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and Redirect to Wikipedia per above: WP:SELF violation and redundant. Danski14(talk) 02:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Wikipedia. If you check "what links here", there are tens of articles where "Wikipedia editor" is used in a blue link, in the sense that "YechielMan is a Wikipedia editor." The target of the linkage should be consistent with that usage. The article itself should be deleted. YechielMan 14:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.