Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Addiction

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was BJAODNized. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 10:27 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Addiction

• BJAODN I change my vote to BJAODN. Havok 18:03, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — non-scientific "condition", or else a joke. — RJH 15:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Belongs in Wikipedia namespace, and I do think it's there already. Delete as fork (or redirect if you must, but RFD is opposed to cross-namespace redirs). Radiant_>|< 15:13, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Kind of obvious why. -- Natalinasmpf 15:36, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete belongs in Wikipedia namespace and we already have pages for wikipediholics. - Mgm|^(talk) 15:59, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
• As per Radiant! and MacGyverMagic, we already have Wikipedia:Wikipediholic. No BJAODN. Delete. Uncle G 16:13, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC)
• move to BJAODN and put redirect to Wikipedia:Wikipediholic at the place (maybe with un-capitalized 'A'). — MFH: Talk 22:59, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. JamesBurns 06:16, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• No BJAODN. Another page created with the direct intent of having it on BJAODN. Strong Delete. -ÅfÇ++ 07:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and add redir to Wikipedia:Wikipediholic--ZekeMacNeil 03:42, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.