Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikijumping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikijumping

Wikijumping (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

PROD removed by author without comment. Wikipedia is not for something made up one day, and no references establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete madeup nonsense Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - Per WP:NONSENSE. asenine ^t/_c\^r 15:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete yep, nonsense is not allowed. ArcAngel (talk) 17:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, but it's a funny article.--Berig (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the article is a proof you can learn something or get an idea even on pages doomed to deletion. Unfortunately not very often. --Ruziklan (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong delete - made-up, WP:SELF Aleta ^Sing 17:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete - per WP:NONSENSE. Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk? 17:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, obviously, but am I the only one who remembers this showing up under a different name a week or two back? --Dhartung | Talk 18:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• No, I also remembered something similar, and I looked at the logs to see if this had been deleted before, but no - the earlier one must have been under some other name. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The name of the game that was similar to this (and summarily deleted) was Five Clicks to Jesus if i'm not mistaken. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 13:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - can find no coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Not to mention WP:SELF. --BelovedFreak 21:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I wouldn't consider this nonsense, though; it's just another iteration of the same game that has been deleted at least 24 times before under different names, and had been deleted at least 15 times before the supposed creator of this game "invented" it. See my user page for details. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent WP:NONSENSE. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• If you think this is a Speedy Delete candidate, please review WP:NONSENSE. This article makes perfect sense. I recommend a slow carefully thought out delete per WP:N. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 17:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Agreed. WP:NONSENSE is for articles that can't be understood by reading them. This is silly, but it's just something made up one day. Not the same thing. --Dhartung | Talk 23:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree as well. If you read this article, you will know how to play this game, so it's not nonsense. Of course, if you've been on Wikipedia for a while, you probably knew the rules of this game before this article was even written, because we've seen it many times before under other names. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.