Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki golf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki golf

Wiki golf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is entirely unreferenced, self-referential, and concerns an apparently non-notable game. John254 01:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, needs two to play. Wikipedia isn't for things made in school or work one day. VoltronForce 01:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:NFT. We actually had (and may still have) a page about this game in WP:FUN. WP:ASR also applies, per nom. Shalom ^Hello 01:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment I don't think that's actually a Criteria for Speedy Deletion. --Wingsandsword 02:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete this completely fails the idea of verifiability. Nyttend 02:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NFT, was just about to nominate this myself when I reloaded the page and saw it had been done already. --Wingsandsword 02:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This is a prime example of something made up in school one day. Lets snowball this discussion. It is obvious where it is going. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 02:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is virtually identical to Six degrees of Wikipedia. ●DanMS • Talk 03:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unencylcopediac article--Sefringle^Talk 05:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Oysterguitarist 06:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Transwiki somewhere then delete - Someone put it in a sandbox, this is strange enough for notability somewhere, just not Wikipedia. Overall vote is Delete. Guroadrunner 09:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 09:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NOTE. --Malcolmxl5 13:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Do Not Replace with another game - guessing how many seconds it takes for the folks at AfD to point out that this game is mentioned in WP:NFT as a very special example of what not to do. Instead, Delete like so many times before. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator for all the reasons stated above. Burntsauce 18:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.