Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki-Protest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 05:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki-Protest

Neologism for, umm, I'm not too sure, something to do with deleting articles from Wikipedia Cnwb 05:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Consider this my own brand of Wiki-Protest --Ruby 05:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. The creator's talk page may offer a clue as to the purpose of this article. Cnwb 05:32, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is all we need. Herostratus 06:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonviolently, of course. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as vandalism. --Hansnesse 07:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Chairman S. | Talk 07:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, legitimizing vandalism? begone! — Graibeard ^(talk) 08:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nonviolently to remove inappropriate content from Wikipedia. Capitalistroadster 09:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense article. --Terence Ong 14:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, POV attempted justification of creator's blanking and spurious AfD's of sex related articles that s/he apparently disaproves of. It's vandalism no matter what you try and relabel it as. I'd go borderline speedy on this as page creation vandalism and consider blocking user permanantly if s/he doesn't learn to play nicely.--Isotope23 15:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment And then there is this edit. Pornography and sex-related articles, and Èclairs! If it were not so clearly vandalism, I'd be inclined for BJAODN. --Hansnesse 18:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all above. Daniel Case 19:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• I'm protesting this protest. Delete.--み使い Mitsukai 21:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as WP:POINT, I'd like to point out that destruction of information, while obviously vandalism, could be seen as violent, although not physically. Makemi 23:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nonsense. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 23:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, just attempting to disagree with WP:POINT by coining a term. -- Mithent 00:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Camillus (talk) 00:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Wiki-Delete as per above and it's a pointless neologism too, kind of like prefixing everything with e-. Therefore, it can't really be improved. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• BJADON - or maybe just plain delete. See all of above. CAPS LOCK 05:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.