Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii60

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted and protected from recreation (CSD G4) by User:RadioKirk. Zetawoof^(ζ) 09:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wii60

Not a common meme. A comment on the talk page leads me to believe this may be an attempt to promote a Wii60 community. Optichan 15:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - people can want know the meaning of the term because is widely used now in internet forums. --Ragnarok Addict 15:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite and keep I believe I created the article in a much different form but the history page doesn't show anything besides the current version with and without the delete tag. This is a fairly common term to run across in videogame circles in the wake of E3, and it will only grow when the PS3 and Wii come out later this year. I am in no way involved with the Wii60 or Wii60.com, except that I plan on getting both the Wii and the 360. I have rewritten the article. Transwiki. It is a neologism, but an important word in the gaming community. KevinPuj 15:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

* Transwiki to Wiktionary, merge into either Wii or Xbox 360, or just delete. I get 168,000 hits for Wii60, but it is nothing more than a definition. -- ReyBrujo 17:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete a neologism without notability and not encyclopedic, its a best a definitinion of a fan term. Note that a recent version of this article was recently deleted after an AfD. This version is slightly better, as the POV has been removed, but it still doesn't rise to the level of an encyclopedia article. Gwernol 17:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; neologism and hypersuperduperminor unknown fansite. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 17:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. However, if at least 3 examples each of this can be found on any notable 2 boards (IGN, Gamespot, Nsider) and 2 nn boards (anything hoasted by invisionfree), I will vote keep instead. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ac1983fan (talk • contribs) .Changed to Weak Keep, seems common enough.--Ac1983fan (talk • contribs) 23:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, 166,000 unique Google results, but as most are forum or blog posts this seems to be a typical internet-meme. I can't recall the guidelines or policy relating to those, though I recall a recent discussion. If you really want mentions at large forums/fansites, they can be found at Gamespot, Evil Avatar, Nintendo, N-Sider, Team Xbox, Rotten Tomatoes, Gametrailers.com, and so forth. It still seems to lack much in the way of encyclopedic merit, but I'm not voting since I've not no idear. I'm currently rolling a very weak keep. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 22:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Internet meme, and not a very well-known one at that. Consider listing it on some of the internet slang dictionary sites instead. Ladlergo 11:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information an indesciminent. Havok (T/C/c) 13:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete It just isn't that big a deal to warrent it's own page Ixistant 21:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Wii or Delete per nom. ~ Hibana 23:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's just a very small internet meme and nothing more than internet slang(like Ladlergo said). Not deserving of it's own page. TJ Spyke 01:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete While my first impulse is for compromise, maybe a redirect to the Xbox 360 page, where a tiny blurb could be included about "Wii60", that is generous, and I don't think it is warranted. If people want a definition, they could look it up somewhere else, but Wikipedia isn't the place. Dancter 01:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

This AfD was incomplete, I am listing it now. - Liberatore(T) 15:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• NOTE: article was already deleted trice. - Liberatore(T) 15:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

  Changing vote to Speedy Delete per CSD:A4. Tagging the page as {{db-repost}}. -- ReyBrujo 15:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.