Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wigfield Farm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 02:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wigfield Farm

Wigfield Farm (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No doubt a worthy enterprise but not notable. Plenty of Ghits but they are directory/tourist guide entries and I can find no reliable sources showing that there is anything notable about this to differentiate it from many other 'community farms' and there are no secondary sources to meet WP:N. Delete. TerriersFan 14:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not notable. Has no particular importance or impact outside its immediate locality so far as I can tell. --Malcolmxl5 14:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep as Ghits about this place would per touristy. Needs more cites. Bearian 21:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Sorry, but I don't see your grounds for keeping? There is no objection to 'touristy' references provided that they are from a reliable source (major newspaper, official tourist board etc.) that establishes notability. The objection is to sources of a directory or tourist guide nature that simply describe where it is, what it is and what it does. Establishing notability doesn't mean that it exists, or that it has rare breeds that people come to see; what is needed are multiple RSs saying that there is something special (i.e. notable) about this farm that marks it out from large numbers of similar establishments. HTH. TerriersFan 20:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no sources establishing notability, and little or no prospect of any turning up afaict. SamBC 00:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.