Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wickedtickle.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed delete per WP:SNOW.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 02:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wickedtickle.com

Wickedtickle.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nonnotable website, no sources cited to show notability, "300 members". NawlinWiki 17:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


OK, so how do you go about satisfying your need to see "notability"? We're consistently a top search hit in Google fore anything entertainment based in this region. We're approaching 300 members in less than a year, which is saying something for the entertainment niche in this area. We've got several million hits in 1.5 years. We've been reviewed by this area's most notable entertainment writer, Robert trudeau. We've been asked by this region's civic leaders and music community to represent Ark-La-Tex music and it's long and storied history to the world. We've worked with the James Burton (guitarist for Elvis Presley) International Guitar Festival. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WickedTickle (talk • contribs) 17:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC) — WickedTickle (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


Also, we work with some of the the biggest names in this area, including the Red River Revel, Tipitina's and James Burton, all of which are also listed in Wikipedia. We're also consistently the #1 listing in Gooigle for "ArkLaTex Entertainment". —Preceding unsigned comment added by WickedTickle (talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC) — WickedTickle (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete as per nom. I cant see anything notable in this (yet). Maybe some sources could prove me wrong? Marcus22 18:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. Blog entries of the nature cited don't confer notability AFAIK. Accounting4Taste 18:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails to meet WP:WEB criteria. -- The Anome 18:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • DELETE as WP:SPAM with a heaping side order of WP:COI, fails WP:WEB. Not notable. OfficeGirl 19:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete spam, spam, spam . Sasha Callahan 19:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Very much spam and COI. Article author needs to read both WP:N and WP:COI. If he can satisfy WP:N, it might be savable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Spam. Per nom. Yamakiri on Firefox 22:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as pure WP:SPAM. On a side note, the creator's username has been blocked due to being spammy as well. shoy 23:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - SNOWBALL. As per rest; NN, COI, OR etc... Why don't admins clean this away faster when there's such an obvious consensus? Spawn Man 02:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.