Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WiTendoFi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletendo. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WiTendoFi

This page fails due to being considered Self-Promotion of a trivial webpage. Delete per WP:N, WP:VAIN. NisMax 04:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• If it's little different than the previous version, it can be speedied. [[1]]. --Chaser T 05:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB. Dionyseus 05:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 05:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The site isn't notable enough. Considering DSmeet was a bigger and more popular site yet and it had its article removed, I don't see why this one should get one. --Sakurina 09:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Promotion of a trivial website --Killaferra 13:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Davidpdx 19:36, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB. -- Alias Flood 19:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Zos 20:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB. -- ebradford 18:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Dionyseus. —C.Fred (talk) 04:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Do not delete The site is very unique, has a very large member count, and is somewhat important to the DS community due to its devotion to Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection, and also due to its highly helpful features. --Gaming King 22:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Re:Gaming King This site isn't unique. There are numerous NDS friend code sites out there. As mentioned below, DSMEET is one of them who had a Wikipedia article deleted. In fact, if I recall correctly, it was the creator of WiTendoFi that asked for it to be deleted. As mentioned in the discussion regarding DSMEET's Wikipedia article, Wikipedia is not a web directory... nor is WiTendoFi a notable enough site to warrant such an article. This article is nothing more than an advertisement for WiTendoFi and as such fails to meet Wikipedia criteria. Even you admit it's only "somewhat important." That's definitely not notable enough to be here.NisMax 13:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete They didn't like DSmeet it when DSmeet had one of these, I remember that, and DSM had more users and features then compared to WiTendoFi now. agahnim 03:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.