Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why people use Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to User:Erebus555/debate1. – ABCD 22:07, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Why people use Wikipedia
non-encyclopedic, maybe put a talk page somewhere to discuss why we use it.Howabout1 16:28, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Note: Nominator forgot to list this on the VfD page. No vote for me yet. Zzyzx11 17:10, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think pages in the wikipedia namespace have to be encyclopedic. Kappa 18:02, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The only contributor to this article and its related talk page is Erebus555. Seems to me to be a rather one-sided discussion. Userfy if appropriate; Delete if not. android↔talk 19:45, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Comment sorry, sorry. I didn't notice it was a wikipedia page, i'll be more careful about putting pages on VfD. Anyone can take this off VfD.Howabout1 21:42, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Userfy I highly doubt this fits any sort of inclusion. --InShaneee 23:01, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I only put this on yesterday. It may seem one sided because no one has seen it yet. And if oyu want me to, I will take the "Wikipedia:" off the beginning - (Erebus555 11:24, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC))
- I have an idea. I will add it to part of my user area. something like User:Erebus555/debate1 or something like that. What do you guys think? (Erebus555 11:27, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC))
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.