Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Nasa was created

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, original research, should be covered at NASA if anywhere. NawlinWiki 13:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why Nasa was created

Why Nasa was created (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An essay of sorts containing likely original research. All of the good info is already covered in the NASA article. PROD was removed by the article creator. Wickethewok 07:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not for essays. MaxSem 08:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per MaxSem; also the section named "Conclusion" in the article makes it pretty clear it's OR. I'd suggest Speedy Delete, but there's no policy support for that. Autocracy 08:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 11:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete! Al-Bargit 11:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.