Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who will miss mary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:15 (UTC)

[edit] Who will miss mary

nn band vanity You (Talk) 00:06, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep about 1400 hits on google. Article could be expanded Billhpike 00:08, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC) — (Billhpike's 25th edit.)
  • Delete without prejudice against recreation when circumstances change for the band. 158 unique Googles for "who will miss mary" band. No allmusic.com entry. Article does not assert notability or meeting any one criterion in WP:MUSIC. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 00:43, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per AиDя01D. -Splash 02:02, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Does not meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. --FCYTravis 03:18, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. --WikiFan04ß 2:11, 22 Jun 2005 (CDT)
  • Keep and expand. Band has some notability. JamesBurns 07:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Not that I don't trust you, James, but do you have a link or something that would show this? AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 11:31, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: First, this should be a speedy delete candidate for being criterion #1. Second, no notability offered in the article. I wish "keep" voters would help the rest of us by editing the article to make it better. Third, I suspect it's even misnamed, that it's "marry" rather than "mary." Fourth, no indication of notability, no contract, no records, no distribution, no influence on others, etc. Geogre 11:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: I agree that it is a rather uninformative sub-stub but it is not Patent nonsense. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Reply: No, no, I didn't mean that it was nonsense. I was referring to "very short articles with little or no content." This article is "A band founded in 1997 in city." Notice that it lacks a subject to the sentence? It's all an object of an implied verb. This is an article that people are voting "keep" on? Geogre 05:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Who will miss this article? I won't. Delete per WP:MUSIC or lack thereof. Radiant_>|< 13:27, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete every single-sentence article that shows no notability and gives no useful information. You don't honestly believe that this little gem is going to be of value to anyone, do you? --Scimitar 14:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. "...The band gigged incessantly over the next year, from London’s Borderline and Barfly to New York City’s Bitter End and Mercury Lounge, taking in summer festivals and major events such as the London City Showcase, where The Guardian pronounced them "the highlight of the day...". [2]. Kappa 14:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Don't click this link if you have your speakers turned up... :-) AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:00, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete for failing to meet WP:MUSIC --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 14:39, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Scimitar for failing to establish notability. --Xcali 19:55, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • keep but please expand it too Yuckfoo 22:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep but obviously expand. Phoenix2 23:21, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable yet, the official site shows only one single and one "mini-album" have been released. I may change my vote if someone shows anything else that proves notability (Billboard success, any of stuff from the music guidelines). Cyclone49 01:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I concur. They might be close to hitting it big, but I've not seen any evidence that they meet WP:MUSIC. Girl's got a great voice, though. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:05, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Kappa (talk · contribs). Pburka 02:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.