Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Let the Frog Out
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Crazy Frog Presents Crazy Hits --JForget 23:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Who Let the Frog Out
This is non-notable song, it fails WP:MUSIC. Reverend X (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per inability to satisfy WP:MUSIC#Songs. The album that contains this song is notable per [1], but not the song on its own. -Gwguffey (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree. The recording isn't notable enough to stand on its own. It's worth noting in the article on the song being parodied, and is already likely listed at Crazy Frog's article and the album article. That's all that's needed. (No objection to a redirect, either) 23skidoo (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete A parody song that is not notable. AlbinoFerret (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to the album as plausible search term. -- saberwyn 00:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - utterly non-notable. (A redirect to the album would be fine, though.) Terraxos (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect - the article itself is not notable, but that doesn't mean someone won't punch that into the search bar at some point. Redirect it to its respective album, there's no harm in that. Red Phoenix (Talk) 15:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.