Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Whitification

Whitification (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism, unreferenced word. wikipedia is not dictionary anyways.-- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 00:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete/Merge - WP:NOT/DIC /Merge with Racial whitening, very little references found. [1], sounds like a urban dictionary term. looks like it contains WP:OR. Tiptoety 01:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Not is not a dictionary. Merge with Wikitionary if not already existing. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Racial whitening, no real content. THE KING 07:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete rather than perpetuate a neologism as a redir. Was going to go with redirect to Racial whitening but it appears to be a neologism that isn't a common mis-spelling. --AliceJMarkham 01:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.