Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehot property

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Whitehot property

Whitehot property (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reads like something your real estate agent would hand out. No sources, no verification, just a sales term and not a very notable one at that. Thinly veiled advertising, though not for a specific product or firm. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 10:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete WP:OR, as no references are provided. WP:NEO based on the phrase term ... has become more prevalent since mid-2007. I could name a few more, but those should suffice Yngvarr 10:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:OR. A clear case of original research. -- Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 13:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete agree with all the above. Pollytyred (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete per everyone, totally unencyclopedic.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, ditto and etcetera. No doubt inserted by someone who wants to sell you a plan about how you can Make Money Fast by identifying "whitehot properties". - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.