Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White pearl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-08 22:15Z

[edit] White pearl

White pearl (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• WP:NOT. Belongs on RuneScape Wiki. Elite Deletionist 14:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Clearly meets WP:NOT. Goodnightmush 14:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 15:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into the Runescape game article. Just H 15:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and transwiki - not merge - per nom. Percy Snoodle 17:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable trivia. Every fictional fruit does not require an article.... WJBscribe 19:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Transwiki to RuneScape Wiki if they want it, and delete here, not notable enough for a merge anywhere. BryanG^(talk) 20:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or transwiki does not meet WP:FICT.-- danntm ^T _C 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - rogue subpage. Not even the RuneScape Wiki bothers with an article on this. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.