Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White diet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was red link. Krimpet (talk) 23:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] White diet
I cannot find any reference of this, but it may be a valid topic if someone can verify and explain it. 650l2520 22:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- speedy delete lacks context, unsourced. Although possibly true (AGF), not something that I learned in medical school. At best, this could be merged into the Autism article, but without sourcing, would probably get deleted there as well. —Gaff ταλκ 22:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Regular Delete It's true that autistic people tend to do this, but I don't think the term in this form is all that commonly used. - Richfife 22:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per Gaff. --ROASTYTOAST 04:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Doczilla 05:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Gaff as well. Ford MF 08:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - autism has its many varieties. You could argue a case for a red diet article, a blue diet article. Any colour. This one is un-sourced and irrelevant. T. Moitie [talk] 14:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per Gaff, but don't merge. I couldn't find any reliable sources on the internet, so the context that is present can't be verified. *Cremepuff222* 19:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to diet (and mention on autism). ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 19:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Autism therapies - The content is factual and encyclopedic but perhaps not enough to warrant an article. Or not unless someone writes a worthwhile article. Do a Google on "white diet" and "autism". --Richard 05:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.