Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Horse Circle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:22, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] White Horse Circle

Oh cmon its a traffic circle nn Delete --Aranda56 01:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete state highways can probably have articles, but not county roads or their intersections. -Lethe | Talk 02:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I have driven through this so-called "circle" many times. (And it isn't even a circle, as the article points out. It's actually kind of a triangle where three roads come together.) There isn't a single thing notable about it. ♠ DanMS 03:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I can understand if some roads warrant articles, but articles on specific intersections is taking things too far. - Mgm|(talk) 10:08, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete the "roadcruft" is going way too far out of hand. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, though this isn't even the worst offender in the realm of roadcruft. Mindmatrix 16:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. A very few traffic circles might be notable. This is not one of them. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  • weak keep Traffic circles in New Jersey are locally notable (even if they're not traffic circles in its purest sense anymore). We're not talking about some quaint countryside intersection. Roodog2k (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. — Knowledge Seeker দ 16:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep local landmarks. --SPUI (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • weak keep - i don't see that many reasons to delete it. it is not the worst article i've ever seen on wikipedia.--Alhutch 23:19, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. While it is not the worst article I've seen in wikipedia, all worse articles are ripe for deletion as well. -R. fiend 00:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Stay dead, stay dead, stay dead. Denni☯ 01:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although a calendar with pictures of traffic circles was a big hit [1] here in Britain (where they are called "roundabouts"), it was just a novelty thing. This is a more extreme case of roadcruft. --A bit iffy 14:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, no claim to notability made here or in the article. --fvw* 01:50, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all non-notable traffic circles. Quale 06:30, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
    • As all traffic circles are "notable", this should be treated as a keep vote. --SPUI (talk) 06:55, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Bollocks. -R. fiend 16:10, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
        • I'll note that SPUI deleted the AfD tag in the article. He's getting passionate and breaking rules over a traffic circle? --Calton | Talk 02:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete good grief --TimPope 18:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. My brain hurts. Pilatus 18:29, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article does not establish or even assert notability. --Stormie 02:09, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Oy vey. Delete. --Calton | Talk 02:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Traffic circles were once a very notable feature of New Jersey roadways -- just ask anyone who drove there 20 years ago -- and are of historical significance, therefore worth documenting. TCC (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with the nominator. Zach (Sound Off) 05:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.