Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where You Belong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Where You Belong

Where You Belong (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete due to notability issues. We should not have articles for any company slogan unless that slogan gave extreme social or moral effects. Even Nike, Inc. have no "Just do it" article. Lenticel (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, "Where You Belong" is already mentioned in the network's article where it belongs; no evidence given for independent notability outside its network. -- Mithent (talk) 11:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Rami R (talk) 14:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This topic is not even significantly covered on the company's own corporate website. It does not appear to be notable. Maralia (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Also note, I just removed the lyrics included in the article due to WP:NOT#LYRICS and WP:COPY. So now the article has even less notable content. -Verdatum (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

*Rescue/Weak Keep. Okay, for the non-Filipinos here, that may seem non-notable, but Where You Belong is pretty much the Filipino equivalent to Still The One. We can expand on this one some more, then decide on what to do. So, for now, it's time to rescue. Also, I find it hard to believe we have no article on Just do it ViperSnake151 23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Reply That's the beginning of a compelling argument. Do you believe there is evidence to show that it has notability outside the network? Further Do you believe there are references capable of providing sufficient content related to the topic to warrant it's own article? As a retired theme song it seems sufficient to keep the information within GMA Network. I suspect that if Just Do It was not already an article, it would be a redirect to Nike, Inc., perhaps that's appropriate here. I'm uncertain. The Nike slogan would never warrant an article of it's own, as it would only be a brief extension upon the significance and origin of the term. -Verdatum (talk) 23:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
    Merge/Redirect Okay, if that's the case, maybe we should just merge it into the main GMA article and redirect it to the "Branding of the GMA Network" section. --ViperSnake151 02:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. No further assertions of notability; lyrics and trivia. No social impact or economic impact either. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 03:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fancruft. It's just a friggin' motto that is better left on the original GMA7 article. ---Tito Pao (talk) 04:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.