Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where God Went Wrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE —Whouk (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Where God Went Wrong

• Keep. I've also read the book. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sidma (talk • contribs) 14:38, May 24, 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've read the book. It was ok. Not the greatest book ever, but not so bad that it didn't exist. I should know, it's gathering dust on my shelf. Amy12
• As long as google remain the source of what is "verifiable" then a lot of thing s will remain unverifiable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.215.6.50 (talk • contribs) 17:31, May 23, 2006

While there is something (podcast?) by this name it's not as described here. Found it on CSD, bringing it here, no vote from me. The Land 20:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Hoax? Google search for "Where God Went Wrong" Esmond Cassidy reveals no hits, same with "Esmond Nolan Cassidy". I'm skeptical of anyone born in '83 being a published doctor, too. In any case, it's currently not verifiable. -- Scientizzle 20:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Google book search also fails to find it, although it finds the podcast on CD and a reference to Douglas Adams's books. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete seems non-existent, certainly nn, 23 year old published doctor seems fishy. --Eivind^t@c 21:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As I stated in when I raised the question of notabilty in the article itself, it appears to be someone trying to wikify a dream. Yanksox 21:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable, nn podcast, most probaly a hoax. --Terence Ong 04:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Also the 4 redlink editors contributing to the article are very likely sockpuppets of User:Renegadetenshi who should be warned against doing this. probable User:196.23.11.98 puppetmaster. -Quiddity 17:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

  The ISBN currently given at the bottom of the article is for a completely different book. I'm removing it. Amy12, (comment at top) is one of the potential sockpuppets in question. user:137.215.6.50, (comment at top) is the adder of the fake isbn reference. -Quiddity

• Comment If the book is published, where is the ISBN? — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I'm concerned with the flogging of possible sock puppets. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yanksox (talk • contribs) 15:41, May 24, 2006 (UTC)

  flogging or flagging? ;)

  They were all created the same day, and only edited the one obscure article. Each is also responsible for a seperate chunk of misinformation. If that isnt evidence of a very high potential of puppetry, i dont know what is ;) -Quiddity 18:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

  Flogging it is then The Land 18:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.