Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wham City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Cúchullain ^t/c 02:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wham City

Wham City (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notability per WP:ORG. Only media coverage is one article in an alternative weekly publication. The members listed are mostly non-notable. Nv8200p talk 15:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:V, and the fact that only two of the many listed members have articles (and one of those is on AfD!) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The Baltimore City Paper is a well-established alt weekly. Perhaps the article could be condensed to only include the more notable members, such as Dan Deacon. Toscaesque 16:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. There may be a WP:COI element in the article, but I found a couple of decent secondary sources[1] [2] and I think they probably meet ORG. However, I agree with Toscaesque that, if the article is kept, some condensation is called for.--Kubigula (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.