Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whale tail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. STANDARD DISCLAIMER: NO CONSENSUS NOW DOES NOT PRECLUDE FORMATION OF NEW CONSENSUS IN THE FUTURE. IN PARTICULAR, THIS AFD SHOULD NOT BE CITED AS THE SOLE REASON TO SUPPORT OR OPPPOSE A REDIRECT/MERGE/WHATEVER. Johnleemk | Talk 11:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Whale tail

Dicdef for a slang neologism. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: People have nothing better to do, eh? —Wknight94 (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• I would say transwiki to Wiktionary, but they'd just delete it, so let's save them the bother and delete it here too. Stifle 00:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I just added to it. 4.250.198.130 05:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, the "most creative word of 2005". Kappa 08:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Since the ADS cite was added, I'm changing my nomination to a weak keep; it may be a rather weak claim to lasting notability, but we're not trying to save paper here. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Won the ADS creative word, could be extended further and related to fashion industry --vossman 04:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, dic-def neologism. incog 18:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I was just coming to create this page, but it was already here. Beisnj 04:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Vossman --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 04:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

keep yes

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.