Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wexelblat disaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wexelblat disaster

Wexelblat disaster (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

While writing/editing geological disaster articles I came across this one, found it interesting and decided to expand. To my surprize it turned out to be a neologism of very unfrequent use. While the topic seems notable, but the term is not (yet). Nearly all content is sourced from a sci-fi writer Bruce Sterling personal hobby webpage, plus an interview with Wexelblat guy, who playfully says he is "chagrined" with the term (oh really? don't use it yorself, then). Laudak 18:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination -- Dougie WII 18:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. Tx17777 20:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, can't find reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.