Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westside Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 11:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Westside Church

Westside Church (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article has no secondary sources to show notability. Alksub 21:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:N. STORMTRACKER 94 21:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Borderline WP:SPAM article about a non-notable church. — Wenli (reply here) 01:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not www.westsidechurch.com.au. Stifle (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't see anything significant here. Whists I have no idea what figures for Australian churches are, 300 members is barely above one standard deviations above the norm in the US. No third party sources.jonathon 23:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment This is a contested PROD. Comments about the PROD notice can be found here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 01:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable due to lack of coverage. Sole reference is a directory listing. Nuttah68 19:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete I've spent ages on this to try and make it perfect. I'll add more to it in the future. I've provided a reference even though I don't think an article must have an INTERNET article available on the web for it to be considered notable enough. I've put a lot of work into it and believe I tried to make it as fair and balanced as possible with no promotion or propoganda within it whatsoever. Don't be mean guys, Spillon 00:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The reason I wrote "delete" is quite simple. I don't see any difference between it, and most of the churches I've been in, or read articles about. What is so special about your church that it should have an article in Wikipedia? jonathon 05:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.