Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Galleria at Roseville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete It sort of claims importance but doesn't explain or substantiate it, and niether do the keep advocates. I'm sure it will be fine to be recreated when substantiation arises.Blnguyen | rant-line 07:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Westfield Galleria at Roseville

Article about a non-notable mall (precedent). — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per the precedent hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 15:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Wine Guy Talk 22:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don't see why this should be deleted. Please give me suggestions to keep it running! (EM) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.187.77 (talk • contribs)
  • • Comment:Vote by an IP. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Reply to 65.78.187.77: Malls are non-notable. See Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations)#Chains and franchises for details. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Reply But there are tons of other malls that have their own wiki page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.21.242 (talk • contribs)
          • If you find any non-notable ones, put {{subst:prod}} on them. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
            • Reply I think a mall that is one of the highest performing in the country would be considered pretty "notable"
• Delete per nom. If it becomes notable, then it can be added later. R.E. Freak 03:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What do you mean by "notable" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.187.77 (talk • contribs)
    • Comment:Duplicate vote by an IP. See above. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Six years after it first opened, it has become one of the most important shopping malls in the Sacramento region. Deleting this would only encourage the deletion of other existing mall articles and set a very bad precedent in the process. Cleanup would be more logical for this promising article...Ranma9617 19:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Important how? Important enough to be in an encyclopedia? --Aguerriero

• • Reply It wouldn't be in an encyclopedia, but if that is the way you are thinking maybe wikipedia should be shut down because there are already websites to find regular encyclopedia entries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.167.42 (talk • contribs)

(talk) 21:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment Thank you for supporting me. Not only is this one of the most, if not the most, important malls in the Sacramento, it is also in the top 3 of the suburban malls in Westfield Group portfolio. I told them that they can give me suggestions to keep it from being deleted, i am open to ideas because I still have more stuff to put on here.
• Delete, completely non-notable, shopping malls are everywhere. --Aguerriero (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Reply Then you might as well go around a delete every webpage for every mall that is on wikipedia. There are probably hundreds of them. Also, there are a lot more starbucks than malls so maybe you should delete their page also. Plus, there aren't tons of malls over a million square feet in this country and there aren't many with sales of $600 a square feet and with a Tiffany & Company coming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.167.42 (talk • contribs)

• • I would love to, actually, unless there is something notable about them. That is the standard we hold other subjects to - why not malls? The Starbucks argument is invalid, because there is a page for the entire corporation, not each individual location. I am fine with an article about a company that runs malls, like Westcor, but not articles for every mall. You are trying to assert notability here in this discussion, but why not in the article? --Aguerriero (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• • • I would want to make the article more "notable" but I am still sitting here talking to you guys debating whether this article will be deleted or not. I don't want to spend time adding on to the article if you are going to delete it. Also, the people who actualy shop at this mall should have somewhere to get info about it. The mall's own website is never updated and has hardly any useful information on it. There are numerous other Westfield malls that have their own websites so I don't see why this one can't. (EM)
• Delete per nom and precedent. I don't see anything in the article to distinguish it from the recently deleted Triangle Town Center. —C.Fred (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.