Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesleyan Christian Academy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 17:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wesleyan Christian Academy

Wesleyan Christian Academy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

School that fails WP:ORG; article does not mention any special achievements, secondary coverage, or the like. Had been tagged with notability concerns sice Oct 06. PROD was contested with comment: "removed prod - high school". I do not find that argument convincing. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 10:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - I don't think all high schools are notable; this one seems not to be. -- BPMullins | Talk 13:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Keep - I'm not really convinced that even state athletic championships make a high school notable, but I'm clearly in the minority on that discussion. -- BPMullins | Talk 02:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTE et al - WP should not be an endless directory of schools. Notability is not established by the article EyeSereneTALK 16:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep Most high schools articles have access to ample material to demonstrate notability. The school has won multiple state sports championships in different sports, and multiple independent reliable and verifiable source have been provided to demonstrate this fact. Notability is proven. Alansohn 17:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per User:Alansohn, rewrite establishes notability through many reliable sources. [User:TenPoundHammer|Ten Pound Hammer]] • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep it has clear athletic notability, now shown by RSs. DGG 01:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive. The larger Wikipedia is the best of a resource it is. One million articles is much better that one hundred thousand articles. It should be a source of information on the most trivial matters to the most important. Callelinea 04:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Okay, so you don't like our notability criteria, no need to prove a point by trying to impose your criteria on debates where we use the actual criteria. This user has been spamming several debates with this BTW. Morgan Wick 07:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Butseriouslyfolks 08:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Alansohn. -- DS1953 talk 05:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.