Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wersi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wersi

Apparantly a fragment of a press release. Tom S. 04:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. Per CSD A8, as a blatant copy of this page. tmopkisn ^tlka 04:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • That doesn't look like a commercial content provider to me. This should have been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, if you ask me. But I suppose I'll vote delete anyway. —Caesura^(t) 04:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. You're probably right, but there is a notice at the bottom of the page, stating that all material is copyrighted, and the author made no assertion that it was taken from another page. tmopkisn ^tlka 05:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment I sort of wish that the "commercial content provider" provision of the criterion weren't there, although I can understand the reason for it. The provision makes the criterion nearly useless. Oh, well. —Caesura^(t) 14:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rob 11:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. NawlinWiki 12:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as copyvio. Also fails WP:SPAM. wikipedia is not free ad space. --DarkAudit 16:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Not speedy candidate due to time constraints, but still a copyvio. --DarkAudit 16:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Peter S. 19:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.