Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Bell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wendy Bell
Found this while I working on the AFD for Jon Burton above. Substantially similar to an article Speedied back in April (only major changes are some wikilinking and the picture) but given the circumstances, didn't think speedying as a repost was appropriate. -- Vary | Talk 02:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Shes won awards. It needs to be verifiable and cleaned up. Zos 02:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, but provide sources for the award statement (according to Google, it seems to be true). --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Six regional Emmy awards is notable. Some sources: [1], [2].--Fuhghettaboutit 04:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Fuhghettaboutit. Dionyseus 07:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep a six-time Emmy winner would be notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral She is NOT a six-time National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS) Emmy award winner. Her name does not appear in the Emmy lists on their official site www.emmy.com. However, she has won REGIONAL awards from the Mid-Atlantic chapter of NATAS: individual achievement awards for best news anchor and best informational reporting (Sept. 2005), and she contributed to reports which won awards such as "Hill District Trash" report which won best service news feature and "Airfare Secrets" which won for informational news feature (Sept. 2005). Bejnar 20:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep She has won numerous awards. It shouldn't matter if they are regional emmy awards or not. 19:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.