Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weird dreams

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was BJAODN and delete. – ABCD 20:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Weird dreams

Currently a personal essay. Zzyzx11 22:26, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete An essay, no content even if it was.Howabout1 22:29, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete of course - DavidWBrooks 23:41, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Seems like something that belongs on a blog. --Fuzzball! 23:56, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete junk vanity test, rambling account of personal dream, orphan. -- Infrogmation 01:17, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• What did this dream mean? It was a prophecy that an article will be deleted. Jonathunder 05:45, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
• I think I fried a synapse or two trying to figure this out. Can I sue Bomis...? Seriously, delete and consider BJAODN less the contact info. - Lucky 6.9 23:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. — JIP | Talk 09:08, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm changing my vote to BJAODN, then replace with an article about the game Weird Dreams and redirect to it. — JIP | Talk 12:36, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, replace by article about the computer game of the same name. Radiant_* 10:54, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • That is a good idea, except that the article should be called Weird Dreams. Make Weird dreams redirect to it. — JIP | Talk 12:34, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I've added this to BJAODN. — JIP | Talk 12:42, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.