Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weetabix Minis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 11:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Weetabix Minis

Vanity. We do not need an article for the different cereal varieties Chris 73 Talk 21:55, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Vanity? Not entirely. It's at least as much due to anal-retentive completism. :-/

On reflection, I (the author) think you have a valid point with respect to Weetabix Minis; I shouldn't have created a separate article. On this basis, *I* vote for deletion...

In the case of Fruit 'n Fibre, the article refers (or should refer if expanded) to a group of similar cereals. If it's felt that this is too inconsequential for Wikipedia, I'm willing to accept that. However, applying such standards, many of the cereal articles in the List_of_breakfast_cereals are *at least* as valid for deletion/consolidation (espec. ones referring to a specific variety of defunct cereal for example).

I'm not going to whine about this so long as there's a clear and consistent line drawn. To some extent, I was following the template of what was there already. On reflection, this was a bad idea.

And definitely get rid of the Weetabix Minis...

Fourohfour 22:27, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, notable. Kappa 01:10, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Weetabix Pilatus 01:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Can't this just go in Weetabix? Gamaliel 03:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep we have lots of cereal articles. They are completely harmless and the subject matter is known to millions. CalJW 04:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep adequately not-paper encyclopedic. -- Curps 05:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - advertising should be paid for. --MacRusgail 13:07, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per CalJW Carioca 06:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as with the other Breakfast cereals. NSR (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.