Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weber and German politics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY KEEP. WP:SNOW take this to the relevent talk pages, or try WP:RfC -Doc 13:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Weber and German politics

This was an 11Kb section in the Max Weber article. The section was created when the article appeared on the Main Page in Dec 2004 and has grown over the years to this length. This section is part of the reason the article was brought to Wikipedia:Featured article review/Max Weber. Because the section was so big (and troublesome) I split it off onto its own article (where we can add whatever template tags we want without harming the feature article) and attached a link to it in the Max Weber#Sociology of politics and government section. I nominate the new article for deletion to ensure (a)it belongs as a separate article (b)it is not original research (I do see a thesis statement in there) (c)all the appropriate template tags are added (needs {{fact, {{citecheck}}, etc.) and (d)that it should exist at all.}} Maintain 05:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Question Are you actually nominating this for deletion? AFD isn't for checking and reviewing articles, you want RfC or Peer Review. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 07:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, I am nominating this for deletion. I actually wanted to just delete the content from the article. Not being that bold, I transferred it to its own article and nominated it for deletion so that this crowd can delete it, correct what I have done, or do something totally different. Failing its deletion, I trust this process will deal with it appropriately. Maintain 08:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Wrong forum this is a content decision - discuss it on the talk page of the relevant article, not here. Or try WP:RFC, which waa made for these discussions.--Doc 08:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as nomination is in the wrong place. Yomangani^talk 12:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per Yomangani ST47 12:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.