Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web x.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. CitiCat ♫ 04:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Web x.0

Web x.0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is original research and opinion, however I rather than prodding, I have brought here in case it is worth merging into Web 2.0 Davidprior 14:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Strong delete as per WP:NFT —Preceding unsigned comment added by M2Ys4U (talk • contribs) 17:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Actually, having quickly researched it, the IEEE has an "International Workshop on Web X.0" [1] so most likely the term is used in a professional context. However, I do not believe there would be enough content to justify a whole article. A short mention on Web 2.0 might be more appropriate, so I now suggest a Merge -- M2Ys4U (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism, no independent/secondary sources. No hits at all in the news archives on Google to build off of, and, as mentioned above, should be trivial to write a sentence or two in web 2.0 that covers the topic in a more clear and concise manner. If this is preserved/if new sources arise, a rewrite seems in order - unimpressive prose, zero citations, slight tone issues. MrZaiustalk 07:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, neologism and mini-essay. Gazpacho 21:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, nonsense ramblings under the pretense of an Neologism not accepted outside of the author's scope. -- Jimmi Hugh 18:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, nonsense that really doesn't need its own page here Lloydpick 08:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.