Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebCollab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WebCollab

Not notable Sleepyhead 12:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

• Undecided. Sourceforge shows around 2000 downloads for each successive version, I don't know how significant that might be. Probably not very. JzG 12:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No notability asserted or evident. cookiecaper (talk / contribs) 13:03, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Just another generic piece of software. Mindmatrix 17:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. 2000 downloads for every version seems like its enought. Achen00 23:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• 2000 users? From al the potential users of web collaboration software? - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 00:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep -- 2000 downloads per version suggests many more than 2000 users. I was mostly convinced by these statistics, however: [1]. Given about 220 MB of transfer a month, i'm figuring they get about 650 downloads a month; this suggests a much larger number of users than 2000, but also counts people who download just to evaluate it (without using) and fails to count a potentially significant group of users who download from a third party (like a package available from an OS vendor as a RPM), which the GPL permits, instead of directly through Sourceforge. --Mysidia (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.