Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wearing LisaB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 23:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wearing_LisaB

This and two other related pages are vanity articles whose contents are either not noteworthy or unverified. Moreover, it is not even close to being in compliance with other wiki standards, such as external links, etc. Ehusman 02:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - now this is advertising. - Richardcavell 02:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - completely vanity/self-promoting/non-notable phrase. —ERcheck @ 04:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as either WP:VANITY or WP:CRUFT. All of 70.112.46.50 (talk • contribs • count)'s other edits have either been to Fashionista or Lisa Brooks, with a drop in on Carrie Bradshaw too.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising. Very self undulgent. Rockpocket (talk) 06:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising. JIP | Talk 08:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Lisa Brooks sounds fabulous, darlings. Nevertheless, delete the advert. Vizjim 08:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete previously speedied as nonsense by Danny, and still nonsense now. Plus non-notable, uncited, vanity. WP:VSCA applies. Just zis Guy you know? 11:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 12:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete obvious advertising Ydam 13:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Google gets less than 2000 hits.--Jusjih 13:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Self promotion, name dropping, irrelevant. --Nosmo 14:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. None of the clothing seem to even be made from human skin. Dominick ^(TALK) 15:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nosense, and even if not, non notable. Crazynas 17:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity--Adrift* 18:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vain -- Malber (talk • contribs) 20:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. Just like the other Lisa Brooks article that just got deleted. Beno1000 21:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pure advertisment. Thetruthbelow^(talk) 23:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity advert.--Jersey Devil 00:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as adcruft; companion article on Lisa Brooks already deleted ---CH 08:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.