Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We're shitting ourselves

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] We're shitting ourselves

Delete Non notable web forum advertising. drini ☎ 04:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep I can't see any forum advertising. The article is as valid as the article on the website it is parodying. Messy 05:57, 19 July 2005 (EST)
• keep. Perfectly notable response to the bombings. There may well be a whole bunch of wiki pages discussing the media response to the bombings, and a parody site is a notable part of that response. If a wiki page for the "we're not afraid" website appears, possibly merge with that. If not, leave this page in. I learned something reading it. Robinh 07:38, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, add as footnote to bombing mainpage. Radiant_>|< 09:32, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, totally agree with Robinh jamesgibbon 16:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Note all the role accounts taking part. Wikipedia is not a web guide, and this has no significance, no traffic, no meaning. If you have dirty breeches, I'm sorry, but this article is wholly inappropriate. The site is less than 10 days old, and already the troll voters want to insist that it's perfectly appropriate to have it in an encyclopedia. Geogre 16:49, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and perhaps mention on 7 July 2005 London bombings per Radiant. This doesn't look like the kind of site that will remain notable. Flowerparty 17:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this shit.  Grue  21:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web guide. --Carnildo 22:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• NN, D. ComCat 22:44, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Parody sites have no long-term meaning and it is clearly NN MicahMN | Talk 00:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. There are plenty of topical websites on here. Why should an anti-war message be any less valid than anything else? There is already an article on the we're not afraid website which it parodies - If this is removed then that one should be too. It seems that some people just don't like the content.Murph 00:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete in the absence of any media coverage and notability. -- Joolz 01:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Being a valid message is a criterion for inclusion now? In an encyclopedia? Murph, don't knock Some People, they do fine work covering up POV around this place, just the way Many, Others, and People do in this article. Bishonen | talk 01:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable parody site. Wikipedia is not a webguide. JamesBurns 07:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, new website that has yet to establish notability. Dcarrano 13:55, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonnotable web site, vanity/promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I too, agree with Robinh's vote. (Unsigned vote by Brun8 -- Joolz 17:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC))
• Isn't Response to the 2005 London bombings the place for responses to the 2005 London bombings (and responses to those responses)? Uncle G 02:12, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete encyclopedia != webguide. --R.Koot 15:33, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web guide. Indrian 20:11, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and merge with We're Not Afraid. If the latter is notable, then a parody of it should at least be mentioned in its article. — OwenBlacker 21:41, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Hillel 02:07, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. --Edcolins 12:28, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge both articles as a single sentence to the main article of the bombings. Should be enough. -- 84.176.181.128 13:24, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --AI 00:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with We're not afraid or delete both Mmmbeer 17:21, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Geogre. DS1953 03:28, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.